Richard Hollingham, a CNN journalist who specializes in scientific affairs, said that the question of the lack of response of space creatures to earthly communications has many answers, including the absence of intelligent space creatures in the immediate vicinity of our universe.
Assuming, among other things, that these “supposed” creatures may not have evolved from being mere microbes, or perhaps – based on our vibrations – the supposed space creatures have concluded that it is safe for them to stay away. But another explanation is that space creatures do not resemble us in any way.
“If we actually find signals, we should not expect it to be a kind of space creature,” said Seth Shostak, an astronomer at Citi, in the Hollingham report, which looks for supposed extraterrestrial beings. Spongy, soft-textured, sitting behind the microphone on the opposite side “(as some cinematographers have imagined).
Citi’s application for signs of intelligent life outside the planet has been active for more than half a century. Although there are some confusing signs (such as those recently picked), the company has not yet reached a conclusion. But Shostak believes that we should think about our future, and imagine how the shape of those supposed space creatures would be.
If we can develop artificial intelligence in the 200 years since the invention of the radio, any space creatures we were supposed to hear a response to would have gone beyond that, “says Chustak. Mostly stage “.
In other words, says Shostak, “most forms of intelligence in the universe are artificial intelligence, and this may disappoint filmmakers who expect small gray creatures with big eyes, no clothes, no hair, no sense of humor” .
But when you develop an artificial intelligence you can use it to develop the next generation of devices you think, and so in 50 years you will have not only much smarter devices than the previous ones, but much smarter than all of humanity, “Shostak admits.
“The big question is whether artificial intelligence continues to be conscious and conscious, sets out its own goals, and determines that there is no need for the biological creatures that have developed it from the ground up,” said astronomer and author of Earthquake Research Stuart Clark.
From the self-conscious “death devices” in Percyker’s books, to Cyborg’s character about Galactica or The Terminator of Science Fiction, there is a rich entanglement with artificial intelligence that controls and destroys lower biological beings.
However, this is not necessarily the compulsory passage of any technological civilization. Artificial intelligence, which is thought-provoking and has superior artificial brains, may not even be possible.
“It’s not always clear to me that this will happen, but the main point is that we are looking for something we can imagine to be like us, even if only a few,” Clarke said.
Citi uses a variety of California-based telescope-based telescopes to find frequencies in space. The receivers are directed to star systems where planets are detected through terrestrial or space telescopes, such as the Kepler Observatory of NASA.
“Are we close to knowing if we are the only intelligence in the universe?” Said astronomer Seth Shostak. “I do not think you can say there is nothing at all, you can not prove You can say that there is something wrong with how we understand it, so it is too early for me to give up searching for creatures on other planets. “
“I think Citi should circulate its research as widely as possible,” says Stuart Clark, “but there’s a smart life in the universe, and it’s going to have a big impact on us.